Revision as of 03:22, 5 March 2010 ddgonzal (Talk | contribs) (Talk:Strut swaps moved to Talk:Strut swaps Truncated) <- Previous diff |
Current revision ddgonzal (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
DD - I saw this question in this article. "A dual master cylinder is safer than a single one. Why?" A dual master cylinder provides redundancy by splitting the brakes into two separate hydraulic circuits. If a leak occurs in one brake circuit, it won't affect the other circuit, leaving at least two brakes operational to stop the vehicle. --[[User:Mildman|Mildman]] 14:33, 7 Feb 2007 (WET) | DD - I saw this question in this article. "A dual master cylinder is safer than a single one. Why?" A dual master cylinder provides redundancy by splitting the brakes into two separate hydraulic circuits. If a leak occurs in one brake circuit, it won't affect the other circuit, leaving at least two brakes operational to stop the vehicle. --[[User:Mildman|Mildman]] 14:33, 7 Feb 2007 (WET) | ||
+ | |||
+ | This article was moved to [[Strut swaps]]. --[[User:ddgonzal|ddgonzal]] 16:48, 20 January 2012 |
Current revision
DD - I saw this question in this article. "A dual master cylinder is safer than a single one. Why?" A dual master cylinder provides redundancy by splitting the brakes into two separate hydraulic circuits. If a leak occurs in one brake circuit, it won't affect the other circuit, leaving at least two brakes operational to stop the vehicle. --Mildman 14:33, 7 Feb 2007 (WET)
This article was moved to Strut swaps. --ddgonzal 16:48, 20 January 2012